
Too busy to post much, but a picture is supposed to say a thousand words. I wish it would say about 15-20 pages, so I wouldn't be furiously writing these last few days:
Chronicles of our adventures living as expats in Buenos Aires, working as a content developer and writer, bicycle touring, and miscellaneous opinions and observations about life in general.
Parsnips and turnips, that is.
O.K. So I know it's silly to get caught up on specific numbers, especially since weight is so relative. But I haven't been under 130 lbs. for 15 years.
Max Front Squat: 100 lbs.
Growth rate might be measured using the following: (These metrics are taken from Jakob Voss: Measuring Wikipedia)
1. Database size (combined size of all articles including redirects in bytes)
2. Total number of words (excluding redirects and special markup)
3. Total number of internal links (excluding redirects and stubs)
4. Number of articles (at least contain one internal link)
5. Number of active Users (contributed 5 times or more in a given month)
6. Number of very active Users (contributed 100 times or more in a given month)
Exclusive Content: wikis that provide a place for content that is not easily available from other places will grow faster than wikis that replicate easily available content.
How to measure: Measure the difference in growth rate between:
Competitive magnets: Contests will result in contribution flurry. But do they lead to an increase in overall contributions?
How to measure:
Seeding: wikis that are seeded with content grow faster than wikis that expect users to create content from scratch.
How to measure: compare the growth rate between:
